Does CMIP6 Inspire More Confidence in Simulating Climate Extremes over China?

查看全文 作　　者：Huanhuan [1]ZHU;Zhihong [2]JIANG;Juan [1,2]LI;Wei [1]LI;Cenxiao [1]SUN;and Laurent [3]LI

机构地区：[1]Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change,Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China;[2]Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education,Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China;[3]Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique,CNRS,Sorbonne Université,Ecole Normale Supérieure,Ecole Polytechnique,Paris 75005,France

出　　处：《Advances in Atmospheric Sciences》索引2020年第37卷第10期,共14页

基　　金：This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(Grant Nos.2017YFA0603804 and 2018YFC1507704);the Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.41805048). 摘　　要：Based on climate extreme indices calculated from a high-resolution daily observational dataset in China during 1961–2005,the performance of 12 climate models from phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project(CMIP6),and 30 models from phase 5 of CMIP(CMIP5),are assessed in terms of spatial distribution and interannual variability.The CMIP6 multi-model ensemble mean(CMIP6-MME)can simulate well the spatial pattern of annual mean temperature,maximum daily maximum temperature,and minimum daily minimum temperature.However,CMIP6-MME has difficulties in reproducing cold nights and warm days,and has large cold biases over the Tibetan Plateau.Its performance in simulating extreme precipitation indices is generally lower than in simulating temperature indices.Compared to CMIP5,CMIP6 models show improvements in the simulation of climate indices over China.This is particularly true for precipitation indices for both the climatological pattern and the interannual variation,except for the consecutive dry days.The arealmean bias for total precipitation has been reduced from 127%(CMIP5-MME)to 79%(CMIP6-MME).The most striking feature is that the dry biases in southern China,very persistent and general in CMIP5-MME,are largely reduced in CMIP6-MME.Stronger ascent together with more abundant moisture can explain this reduction in dry biases.Wet biases for total precipitation,heavy precipitation,and precipitation intensity in the eastern Tibetan Plateau are still present in CMIP6-MME,but smaller,compared to CMIP5-MME. 关键词：CMIP6 CMIP5 intercomparison climate extremes

相关文献

参考文献（51）
引证文献（60）
耦合文献（706）

参考文献(51)

引证文献(60)

耦合文献(706)

互联网出版许可证新出网证(渝)字10号全国400电话 - 免长途话费

Does CMIP6 Inspire More Confidence in Simulating Climate Extremes over China?

参考文献(51)

引证文献(60)

耦合文献(706)

用户提示