维普期刊资源整合服务平台（V6.5）

维普中文期刊产品整合服务

1篇 您的检索式：作者名="David Berstad"

选中清除导出查看参考文献查看引证文献引用追踪共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

		题名	作者	年代	出处	被引量
	1	Techno-economic comparison of three technologies for precombustion CO2 capture from a lignite-fired IGCC显示文摘This paper compares the techno-economic performances of three technologies for CO2 capture from a lignite-based IGCC power plant located in the Czech Republic:(1)Physical absorption with a Rectisol-based process;(2)Polymeric CO2-selective membrane-based capture;(3)Low-temperature capture.The evaluations show that the IGCC plant with CO2 capture leads to costs of electricity between 91 and 120€·MWh−1,depending on the capture technology employed,compared to 65€·MWh−1 for the power plant without capture.This results in CO2 avoidance costs ranging from 42 to 84€·tCO2,avoided−1,mainly linked to the losses in net power output.From both energy and cost points of view,the low-temperature and Rectisol based CO2 capture processes are the most efficient capture technologies.Furthermore,partial CO2 capture appears as a good mean to ensure early implementation due to the limited increase in CO2 avoidance cost when considering partial capture.To go beyond the two specific CO2-selective membranes considered,a cost/membrane property map for CO2-selective membranes was developed.This map emphasise the need to develop high performance membrane to compete with solvent technology.Finally,the cost of the whole CCS chain was estimated at 54€·tCO2,avoided−1 once pipeline transport and storage are taken into consideration.	Simon Roussanaly Monika Vitvarova Rahul Anantharaman David Berstad Brede Hagen Jana Jakobsen Vaclav Novotny Geir Skaugen	2020	Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering2020，14，3：	3

返回顶部每页显示：

共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

goolge学术搜索-维普

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1　渝公网安备 50019002500403号　违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证新出网证(渝)字10号全国400电话 - 免长途话费